Automatic.css

Automatic.css is a CSS framework for WordPress page builders.

Content Management28 eligible domainsautomaticcss.com
Broader database observations
Share of tracked domains0.0%
Avg confidence100%
30-day observation change0

These statistics include detections outside the stricter public preview. Counts can exceed the qualifying domains above; they describe our coverage, not internet-wide market share.

Search database

What is Automatic.css?

Automatic.css is a content management technology. Automatic.css is a CSS framework for WordPress page builders.. Currently detected on 28 quality-eligible websites in the Glympt index.

Official website: automaticcss.com.

Recently detected on

View all →

Estimated countries across broader detections

Includes observations below the public country preview’s confidence and quality thresholds. These are website geography signals, not verified business locations.

AU · 1DE · 1GB · 3HK · 1HR · 1IT · 1NO · 1PL · 1RU · 2US · 8

Related technologies

Co-detected in the broader database

Counts include broader stored detections, without the public preview’s quality filters. Co-detection describes an observation, not a recommendation or integration guarantee.

Frequently asked questions

How does Glympt detect Automatic.css?

By scanning headers, HTML, JS globals, meta tags, and cookies. Detection is automated and non-intrusive.

What does the score measure?

The average detector score for Automatic.css is 100/100. It measures matching evidence, not independently verified accuracy.

Can I export?

Yes. Pro and Business plans include CSV export with full filtering.

Refresh rate?

Observation dates are shown on each report. Refresh timing varies with crawler capacity; you can request a fresh scan from the dashboard.

Does this measure Automatic.css market growth?

Our database recorded a net change of 0 observations in 30 days. New coverage and rescans affect this number; it is not a measure of market growth or migrations.

What is "confidence"?

A 0–100 detector score based on matching signals. Stronger evidence increases the score, but false positives and missed technologies remain possible.